Vacuum Casting VS Roto-molding VS Injection molding

vacuum casting vs roto-molding vs injection molding

Vacuum casting and roto-molding are affordable for customized parts of small volumes, and injection molding is suitable for large-scale production. Let’s explore the unique advantages and applications of each method to determine the most suitable manufacturing process for your specific needs.

Process of Vacuum Casting VS Roto-molding VS Injection Molding

The process of vacuum casting: Vacuum casting utilizes an existing pattern to create a silicone mold under vacuum, and then uses PU material to pour into the mold under vacuum conditions, thereby cloning identical replicas of the original pattern.

The process of Roto-molding: involves injecting room-temperature powdered or liquid molding materials into a rotational mold, using heating and centrifugal force to evenly distribute the plastic over the mold surface, resulting in hollow molded products after cooling. This method is suitable for manufacturing large-sized items but may have difficulties in controlling wall thickness.

The Process of injection molding: it is a commonly used plastic processing method where molten plastic is injected into a mold using an injection machine, then cooled and solidified in the mold before removing the molded product.

Advantages of Vacuum Casting VS Roto-molding VS Injection Molding

Advantages of vacuum casting

  • Low cost and short production cycle, minimal waste;
  • Suitable for processing and producing small-batch products;
  • Replication can be done after making an original model
  • Low failure rate. As long as the original model is correct, the replicas will not be faulty
  • Good repeatability

Advantages of roto-molding

  • Suitable for manufacturing large hollow objects;
  • Material saving;
  • Suitable for producing small batches of multiple varieties;
  • Low cost of rotational mold.

Advantages of injection molding

  • Can form complex shapes and details
  • Suitable for mass production, can be automated, high production efficiency
  • Good dimensional accuracy
  • High production rate
  • Wide range of applicable materials.

Drawbacks of Vacuum Casting VS Roto-molding VS Injection Molding

Drawbacks of vacuum casting

  • Low heat resistance, vacuum cast prototypes can typically withstand temperatures of around 60 degrees Celsius.
  • Prone to shrinkage and deformation after high-temperature heating and cooling, leading to deformation; generally with an error of around 0.2mm.

Drawbacks of rotational molding

  • Relatively higher material costs, as most plastic raw materials are granular and need to be ground into powder for rotational molding
  • Limited materials suitable for rotational molding, with 99% of local rotational mold products being made from PE
  • Low production efficiency and energy consumption
  • Difficult to form solid parts, with poor dimensional accuracy

Drawbacks of injection molding

  • High cost of plastic injection molds;
  • The long production cycle, not suitable for single or small batch production;
  • Limited to thin-walled parts, wall thickness should not exceed 4mm, and thinness should not exceed 0.5mm.

The Materials of Vacuum Casting VS Roto-mold VS Injection Molding

The materials suitable for vacuum casting:

ABS like、PC like、PP like、PE like、PMMA、PVC、Silicone

The materials suitable for Roto-molding:

PE

The materials suitable for injection molding:

ABS like、PC like、PP like、PE like、PMMA、PVC、Silicone

In summary, for low-volume production, both vacuum casting and rotational molding are suitable options. Vacuum casting offers cost-effective and rapid production cycles, making it ideal for small-batch productions. On the other hand, rotational molding is well-suited for creating large-scale, hollow products. However, it has limitations regarding the materials that can be used.

For mass production, injection molding is the preferred choice due to its ability to deliver high accuracy, complicated shapes, and intricate details. With the capacity for automation and high production rates, injection molding is the most efficient option for large-scale manufacturing. However, it should be noted that injection molding comes with higher initial costs related to mold production, and a longer production cycle, making it less suitable for single or small batch production. The choice of production method should be carefully evaluated based on the specific requirements of the product and the desired production volume to ensure the most suitable and cost-effective solution.